Wouldn’t putting people’s degree of religiosity on display help weed out the fantasists?
I think it’s safe to say that the religious fantasists, and I’m not just talking about Muslims, are the type of people that society would be better off without. The thing is, how does one spot them? Society would be safer if this type of believer wasn’t allowed to slip about unseen amongst the herd, wouldn’t it?
Update:It's meant to be fanatacists...but I'm not sure if the word exists.
More Questions From This User See All
Answers & Comments
Verified answer
But it is wrong to discriminate people for their beliefs.I know what you mean and I agree anyway.It would be so nice if an utopian world is possible.All fanatics make trouble, not us.I fanatically agree with you.
Hitler was thinking little like this.
I think that all fanatics are dangerous not just extreme religious fantasists. Jesus is perfect. I follow Him. This world would be a better place if we all did.
I don't want to weed out the "fantasists". They sound interesting. What are they? The word sound intriguing.
Doesn't that work both ways though?
"I think it’s safe to say that the non-Christians are the type of people that society would be better off without."
If a Christian was to say this, this place would explode.
No hypocrisy here, huh?!? :(
What are you wanting to do, make all the people the thought police judge "too religious" display an arm-band to mark them as pariahs or what?
Do you have proof life without "them" will be better?
do you mean fanatics...
I like your made up word though
no