I'm a real Atheist and I would never do such a thing!
Only an ignorant and heartless idiot would do that.
EDIT:
I'm sorry Aron H. Whilst I agree with you in what you say. There is a time and place for these arguments and it's not when someone is grieving the recent loss of a loved one.
I would hope that you would save it for another time when the pain of loss is not so raw.
That would be tacky and even cruel. Reverse the situation. How would they like someone coming up to them while they were grieving and picking a fight over ANYTHING. Tell them to give the grieving person a break and learn when to open their mouth. Or they'll end up eating their whole leg.
i'm, i think (however I to locate your description somewhat stupid). i'm degreed and recommended in scientific fields, have worked as a scientist, and function continued my lifelong activity in technology however I now not paintings as a scientist. could I factor out that it particularly is now not even obtainable to have a "scientific opinion" approximately claimed magical god concerns? Do I could supply an evidence for why, or do you already comprehend why? "For now, faith and technology in particular agree..." i will hardly think a greater ridiculous assertion. And a greater pointless one. What any faith does or does not "agree" with is irrelevant on the priority of technology; faith does now not use the scientific technique, or use records or information -- so their "comments" have no relevance to technology by any means. and on an identical time as diverse religious *individuals* could actual "agree" with technology, religions maximum actual do not. not that it concerns. It takes greater advantageous than in simple terms somewhat dishonesty and retreat to "metaphor" to make any religious textual content cloth "agree" with technology. Peace.
Answers & Comments
Verified answer
I'm a real Atheist and I would never do such a thing!
Only an ignorant and heartless idiot would do that.
EDIT:
I'm sorry Aron H. Whilst I agree with you in what you say. There is a time and place for these arguments and it's not when someone is grieving the recent loss of a loved one.
I would hope that you would save it for another time when the pain of loss is not so raw.
What is a "real" atheist as opposed to a non-real atheist?
I would not argue religion with someone who had very recently lost a loved one.
Would only a "real Christian" tell an atheist that her loved one who just died is burning in Hell?
There are jerks in all camps, and there are decent human beings in all camps as well.
~Ex-Christian. Atheist.
what is a real atheist besides someone who doesn't believe in any gods?
i suppose some atheists might do that, but so might some religious people, so some context would be nice, or some kind of story...
That would be tacky and even cruel. Reverse the situation. How would they like someone coming up to them while they were grieving and picking a fight over ANYTHING. Tell them to give the grieving person a break and learn when to open their mouth. Or they'll end up eating their whole leg.
Would a Christian argue with a Muslim who had just lost a loved one, over their beliefs?
i'm, i think (however I to locate your description somewhat stupid). i'm degreed and recommended in scientific fields, have worked as a scientist, and function continued my lifelong activity in technology however I now not paintings as a scientist. could I factor out that it particularly is now not even obtainable to have a "scientific opinion" approximately claimed magical god concerns? Do I could supply an evidence for why, or do you already comprehend why? "For now, faith and technology in particular agree..." i will hardly think a greater ridiculous assertion. And a greater pointless one. What any faith does or does not "agree" with is irrelevant on the priority of technology; faith does now not use the scientific technique, or use records or information -- so their "comments" have no relevance to technology by any means. and on an identical time as diverse religious *individuals* could actual "agree" with technology, religions maximum actual do not. not that it concerns. It takes greater advantageous than in simple terms somewhat dishonesty and retreat to "metaphor" to make any religious textual content cloth "agree" with technology. Peace.
Do you honestly believe a "real atheist" has some kind of distinct characteristic/personality among all other real non-believers?
did you for get about the "real christian" who with members of his congregation attends dead soldiers funerals to protest against gays.
some people are just jerks no matter what their beliefs.
Is "Real Atheist" the type of label equivalent to "True Christian"?
a real athiest? what is that supsed to mean
EDIT: To Base a group of people who dont believe in god and say that there all heartless is invalid.