He would back down from the stink it would cause just as he did when he proposed that veterans pay for their own medical expenses from injuries during war.
We Americans value our freedom. Very few of us are willing to live in a total dictatorship which is what you keep advocating with your silly, asinine little questions.
well... I'm a liberal. But, he couldn't do that, like, he couldn't, legally, the supreme court would stop him. And I would object monstorously, as would over eighty percent of the population.
Answers & Comments
Verified answer
He would back down from the stink it would cause just as he did when he proposed that veterans pay for their own medical expenses from injuries during war.
I'm agnostic, but I would be quite alarmed by the federal government taking any steps regarding promoting or suppressing religion.
Religion cannot be promoted in public schools, and that's as far as it should go.
If Obama were to reduce children's exposure to Islam, conservatives would shout in support.
If Obama were to reduce children's exposure to Christianity, conservatives would shout in protest.
I'm not a conservative and even I would have a slight problem with that. It is the parents job to raise their child, Not the governments.
In what context are you asking that question? Since it is part of History. it will continue to be taught. It is a mute point.
We Americans value our freedom. Very few of us are willing to live in a total dictatorship which is what you keep advocating with your silly, asinine little questions.
well... I'm a liberal. But, he couldn't do that, like, he couldn't, legally, the supreme court would stop him. And I would object monstorously, as would over eighty percent of the population.
I would site the First Amendment.
Reminds me of a Guns 'n Roses song 'CIVIL WAR'?
I think the less intervention of government the better.