do not understand something approximately brown gas, sounds somewhat hocuss pocuss to me. yet you're actual the assumption of electroysis to transform water to hydrogen and oxygen to then burn in an inner combustion engine is insanity. potential in, electrical energy say a hundred gadgets, potential out as sensible mechanical potential 20 gadgets or much less. yet there's a fashion wherein including water to gas can strengthen gas performance and strengthen engine life and shrink pollutants. In a diesel engine including a small volume of water into the gas leads to a purifier burn, much less NOx production and somewhat greater pressures. All this in turn improves mileage and decreases pollutants. Down part is which you ought to combine the water and gas calmly on the micro point (extremely sonic instruments can do this) and water left in the gas tank will reason corrosion and obtainable gas blockages. So idealy the integration desires to ensue in basic terms as you inject the gas. obtainable, yet not user-friendly and expensive. Lab consequences seem to fifteen% advancements in distinctive parameters. it relatively isn't magic yet consistent with combustion chemistry. i don't understand of any commercial instruments consistent with this vital. yet given the effectiveness, i've got faith some would be on the marketplace if oil fees proceed to upward thrust. making use of this technologies does not be straight forward and it does not be low fee. yet whilst mass produced it ought to diminish pollutants ranges and bring about fee reductions besides. (this study replaced into being performed in the 70s, and whilst oil fees fell returned it replaced into deserted.) The trick replaced into to introduce in basic terms the final volume of water, too lots and it decreased performance, too little and it had no result. From memory it replaced into between 2 and four% water. I had not something to do with this study, in basic terms study the countless papers.
Answers & Comments
Let's take this equation as your reaction:
2H2 + O2 --> 2H2O
We want 100g of water, and we know the molar mass of water is (2*1.00794 + 15.9994)g/mol
So how many moles do we want?
mol water = g water * mol/g water = 100 * 1/(2*1.00794 + 15.9994) = 5.5508mol
mol H = mol H2O * 2molH2 / 2mol2H2O = 5.5508 * 1 = 5.5508mol H2.
Now we'll assume H2(g) is an ideal gas, so use the ideal gas equation: PV = nRT.
R = 0.08214 L.atm/mol.K -> your volume would be in litres, provided you give the temperature in K.
T(K) = T(C) + 273.15 = 25 + 273.15 = 298.15 = T ; P = 1
Let us solve for V in the equation:
V = nRT / P = 5.55084*0.08214*298.15 / 1 = 135.9404 L of H2
Your answer should be somewhere around there, depending on the precision of your values. I, personally, like taking 4 decimal points :P
Hope this helps!
do not understand something approximately brown gas, sounds somewhat hocuss pocuss to me. yet you're actual the assumption of electroysis to transform water to hydrogen and oxygen to then burn in an inner combustion engine is insanity. potential in, electrical energy say a hundred gadgets, potential out as sensible mechanical potential 20 gadgets or much less. yet there's a fashion wherein including water to gas can strengthen gas performance and strengthen engine life and shrink pollutants. In a diesel engine including a small volume of water into the gas leads to a purifier burn, much less NOx production and somewhat greater pressures. All this in turn improves mileage and decreases pollutants. Down part is which you ought to combine the water and gas calmly on the micro point (extremely sonic instruments can do this) and water left in the gas tank will reason corrosion and obtainable gas blockages. So idealy the integration desires to ensue in basic terms as you inject the gas. obtainable, yet not user-friendly and expensive. Lab consequences seem to fifteen% advancements in distinctive parameters. it relatively isn't magic yet consistent with combustion chemistry. i don't understand of any commercial instruments consistent with this vital. yet given the effectiveness, i've got faith some would be on the marketplace if oil fees proceed to upward thrust. making use of this technologies does not be straight forward and it does not be low fee. yet whilst mass produced it ought to diminish pollutants ranges and bring about fee reductions besides. (this study replaced into being performed in the 70s, and whilst oil fees fell returned it replaced into deserted.) The trick replaced into to introduce in basic terms the final volume of water, too lots and it decreased performance, too little and it had no result. From memory it replaced into between 2 and four% water. I had not something to do with this study, in basic terms study the countless papers.