Verified answer

You are being asked to a) watch the speech. I suggest just watching it once, straight through.

b) watch it again, pausing it to take notes as you go. (A third hearing wouldn't hurt, either; to make sure you got the relevant points.)

You are being asked to write an essay, an argumentative essay -- that is, you have one general statement you are arguing for in the essay (a thesis -- which has a number of points in support). So, watch the whole thing, and then think about what one, big point you want to argue for in your essay.

Then, when you watch it again, take notes on what he says and how, to support your one big point, beginning to figure out what your smaller, supporting points are.

Sometime in there, check into other people's analyses and evaluations of that speech, to find some sources to use [for 5) below].

Here's my translation for what those other points are saying:

2) Treat the speech as an argument -- that is, as reasons given to support a conclusion. In this analysis, talk about the people he was addressing, and the context of the speech -- context means all the relevant surrounding facts about where and when, that shed light on the meaning of the speech.

Rhetorical strategies are ways of using language to persuade -- for instance, the way he set up a number of the points, using casual language, so people could keep track of how the facts he used fit together into the argument. Rhetorical devises include things like analogies, evocative words and phrases -- stuff like that.

3) sorry, not entirely clear on this one. You might have to review your course readings and class notes. Clearly it's about use of language -- and you need to give specific examples.

4) This is an admonition to not go into lots of historical detail about the entire election season, and background. Just briefly give the relevant details on stuff that you need to give to understand what he said and why.

5) In arguing your thesis, you need to use other writings or speech -- 2 or 3 sources, that support your basic point, or one of your sub-points. You need to make a list of your sources, and use the APA format -- check your course references for the format. And cite the speech itself in that list, in that format.

Back to process -- after you've watched the speech and taken notes, and consulted resources, and made notes from them, look at all your notes, and start to organize them into some reasonable order.

Then fill out your notes, quoting from the speech and other sources, and explaining your reasoning -- how each specific point you make fits in with your thesis.

Don't be afraid to revise your thesis statement, to be more accurate, as you keep thinking things through.

During all this process, use whatever methods help you keep things sorted out -- maybe make a chart of your thesis and sub-points, with the evidence you're using to support each; a concept map.

Then revise what you've got, making it a coherent and complete argument. You probably should watch the speech again, to see if you're missing something essential.

whew! Hope this helps!

I used to be no longer impressed. Almost always, I discovered her speech to be disingenuous. Tuesday, August 26, 2008 Figures. Michelle Obama charges traces From "principles For Radicals" In Her DNC convention Speech (updated) Figures. Michelle Obama rates strains some radicalFar Left publication in her DNC convention speech. What to make of Michelle Obama's use the phrases, “the sector as it is” and “the world accurately?” From whence do they originate? Are attempting Chapter 2 of Saul Alinsky’s e-book, ideas for Radicals. In last night time's speech, Michelle Obama mentioned something that peeked my curiousity. She stated: "Barack stood up that day," speakme a few talk over with to Chicago neighborhoods, "and spoke words which have stayed with me ever for the reason that. He pointed out “the arena as it's” and “the world accurately..." And, "absolutely everyone pushed through a simple perception that the sector as it is only won’t do – that we've got an obligation to battle for the sector correctly." right here’s an excerpt from Chapter 2 of Saul Alinsky’s e-book, rules for Radicals: "The approach-and-ends moralists, regularly obsessive about the ethics of the way used by the Have-Nots towards the Haves, will have to search themselves as to their real political role. Actually, they are passive — but real — allies of the Haves…essentially the most unethical of all method is the non-use of any manner... The standards of judgment ought to be rooted in the whys and wherefores of life as it is lived, the world as it's, no longer our wished-for delusion of the arena appropriately." the following paragraph sums up my feelings exactly on Michelle's speech. "good, if this occasion has a message, it has executed a excellent job of hiding it," recounted James Carville, a Democrat strategist and political contributor. This was taken from his impressions of Michelle's speech, which screamed disingenuous to say the least. It used to be so apparent and obvious, however didn't hit rough and heavy and didn't make the features that she needed to make. This was once no longer the robust willed, determined lady that all of us have a as a substitute lasting influence of for being unpatriotic, as good as not appreciative for all that america has accomplished for her. Oh, however I do believe you on Obama's strolling accomplice, Biden. LOL!!!

Following the guidelines the President set for speakers at the convention, President Clinton's speech was fact-checked on every point for four weeks prior to him delivering it.

President Obama tries to be very careful that what is said in his campaign is true.

Why are US educators allowed to ask you leading questions that seem to be aimed at delivering a Political bias, or brainwashing you into believing one philosophy over another.

Plead the 5th and tell your teacher to f*ck off. (Whatever you Political views).

This should be posted under homework help.

As for President Clinton's speech, danged fine but not a jewel like Michelle's.

Just walk into class, and point to an Empty chair ....

You should get an A+ !!!

NObama in 2012!!

your teacher is trying to push the democrats arguemnet for electing obama, don't fall for it,

don't write a paper like your teacher suggests either refuse to tell her what she wants to hear or tell your mother that you are being forced to carry water for a democrat it is illegal and immoral for your teacher to do this

or tell your teacher you don't want to write about an impeached president

it culminated with him bringing out an empty suit