Yes, to benefit other voters. I usually vote for one Party or another so I wouldn't be taking advantage of that choice. However it is more democratic and gives voters a broader choice.
Yes, considering the Democrats in PA kicked my candidate off the ballot once more. I bet if we have more than two party rule, we would not be this mess to this extent.
Answers & Comments
Verified answer
yes (to anarchy)
no.
officials are voted for positions we made(created, mandated, etc.)
hope to choose the lesser evil
I think so but then i rather not vote if i have to hit " none of the above "
Yes, to benefit other voters. I usually vote for one Party or another so I wouldn't be taking advantage of that choice. However it is more democratic and gives voters a broader choice.
No sense in even going to the voting booth if you are just going to mark, "none of the above."
Yes, considering the Democrats in PA kicked my candidate off the ballot once more. I bet if we have more than two party rule, we would not be this mess to this extent.
What's the point. If you don't like anyone on the Ballot, don't vote. I certainly do not advocate anarchy.
That's what I would do if I had to vote for Palin:
http://bofads.blogspot.com/2008/12/mccain-unwillin...
Apparently, McCain doesn't think much of her either!
You get to write in the Presidential candidate if you so choose.
I have soon doing that for years.
Were you not aware of this.
yes. instead of choosing lesser evils, the people should have right to negative voting.
You can.
You just leave that question blank as you fill out the rest and it counts as "none of the above"