The fact that Liberals whine and cry more than anyone else has its roots reaching all the way back to the 60's. They have always relied on "civil disobedience". Even thier hack politicians suggest it as an action. They defy authority, the law, the rules and think that numbers will get them thier way.
As for which is positive and which is negative, that is the media with its head up its (_I_). and your even more stupid if you actually believe what the media tells you.
Look at the tea party VS occupy wall street.
No incidents with the tea party to the point that leftist pricks tried to infiltrate the party and act badly to taint thier good reputation.
Where as occupty F**Ks all over were illegally gathering, not peacefully and getting money for support of thier pathetic movement. That isn't even going into the thefts, the rape tents, the police actions, destruction of property and violence Occupy pricks are known for.
So if you can do side by side comparison and still think media should be trusted, your tained, intellectually dishonest and therefore irrelevant.
@Hanna is one dumb beyotch. Liberals want the status quo or to increase thier corrupt 'feeding at the trough" lifestyles, Conservatives merely want to keep the country in line with the constitution which has been trampled by left wing pricks for some time. You all wet your pants when you get someone like Obama whom doesn't view America with respect and how it was founded because you know they will run rough-shod over the laws and majority of the people's wants.
ABC,NBC,CBS,CNN,NPR,MSNBC, NY Times, Time Magazine The Democratic Party, The Democratic White House ... are all one unit. The state-controlled media.
EDIT: Socialists (Liberals) see themselves as those who should make decisions for the rest of us, based on what they perceive to be in our best interests. They assume that some very wise people — like themselves — need to take decisions out of the hands of lesser people, like the rest of us, and impose their ideology through mandates by a liberal government. The self-flattery and self appointed superiority of the vision of liberalism also gives each of its true believers a huge ego stake in that vision, which means that mere facts are unlikely to make them reconsider, regardless of what evidence piles up against their vision, and regardless of its disastrous consequences."
Answers & Comments
The fact that Liberals whine and cry more than anyone else has its roots reaching all the way back to the 60's. They have always relied on "civil disobedience". Even thier hack politicians suggest it as an action. They defy authority, the law, the rules and think that numbers will get them thier way.
As for which is positive and which is negative, that is the media with its head up its (_I_). and your even more stupid if you actually believe what the media tells you.
Look at the tea party VS occupy wall street.
No incidents with the tea party to the point that leftist pricks tried to infiltrate the party and act badly to taint thier good reputation.
Where as occupty F**Ks all over were illegally gathering, not peacefully and getting money for support of thier pathetic movement. That isn't even going into the thefts, the rape tents, the police actions, destruction of property and violence Occupy pricks are known for.
So if you can do side by side comparison and still think media should be trusted, your tained, intellectually dishonest and therefore irrelevant.
@Hanna is one dumb beyotch. Liberals want the status quo or to increase thier corrupt 'feeding at the trough" lifestyles, Conservatives merely want to keep the country in line with the constitution which has been trampled by left wing pricks for some time. You all wet your pants when you get someone like Obama whom doesn't view America with respect and how it was founded because you know they will run rough-shod over the laws and majority of the people's wants.
That's easy. Just look at the basic definition of the words: Which word sounds more "active."?
Which word sounds more "oppressive"?
Liberal: favorable to progress or reform, as in political or religious affairs.
2.
( often initial capital letter ) noting or pertaining to a political party advocating measures of progressive political reform.
Conservative:
1.
disposed to preserve existing conditions, institutions, etc., or to restore traditional ones, and to limit change.
ABC,NBC,CBS,CNN,NPR,MSNBC, NY Times, Time Magazine The Democratic Party, The Democratic White House ... are all one unit. The state-controlled media.
EDIT: Socialists (Liberals) see themselves as those who should make decisions for the rest of us, based on what they perceive to be in our best interests. They assume that some very wise people — like themselves — need to take decisions out of the hands of lesser people, like the rest of us, and impose their ideology through mandates by a liberal government. The self-flattery and self appointed superiority of the vision of liberalism also gives each of its true believers a huge ego stake in that vision, which means that mere facts are unlikely to make them reconsider, regardless of what evidence piles up against their vision, and regardless of its disastrous consequences."
Because Conservatives want to keep the status quo, liberals want to change things.
I think Conservatives are pretty much labeled radicals now that their party has been taken over by Tea Party nutjobs.