Only "B" but only to the extent that the LIEberal left DEMONICrats allow! A GREAT example is by the way THEY interpret the second amendment:
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.Where they claim there are limitations on the type of "arms" a person is allowed to own (ONLY arms that were in common use at the time the 2A was written are what is allowed), how the entire 2A applies ONLY to militias (even though it CLEARLY states "the right of the PEOPLE to keep and bear arms"), the 2A does NOT apply to "high capacity magazines" or what the left defines as "assault weapons", how "reasonable restrictions" are NOT the same as INFRINGEMENT as long as the people are allowed to own SOME type of firearm of the DEMOCRATS choosing, The 2A ONLY applies to "hunting firearms", The commas mean "the people" are excluded from the 2A's protections or because some people CHOOSE to NOT exercise this right that NOBODY should be able to exercise it!
None of the above. The Declaration spoke of unalienable rights in only the most general of terms: Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. Under the US Constitution, the answer is B.
Answers & Comments
Only "B" but only to the extent that the LIEberal left DEMONICrats allow! A GREAT example is by the way THEY interpret the second amendment:
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.Where they claim there are limitations on the type of "arms" a person is allowed to own (ONLY arms that were in common use at the time the 2A was written are what is allowed), how the entire 2A applies ONLY to militias (even though it CLEARLY states "the right of the PEOPLE to keep and bear arms"), the 2A does NOT apply to "high capacity magazines" or what the left defines as "assault weapons", how "reasonable restrictions" are NOT the same as INFRINGEMENT as long as the people are allowed to own SOME type of firearm of the DEMOCRATS choosing, The 2A ONLY applies to "hunting firearms", The commas mean "the people" are excluded from the 2A's protections or because some people CHOOSE to NOT exercise this right that NOBODY should be able to exercise it!
none of your list
look at it this way
you are ship wrecked and live alone on a island the rest of your life
only things that you can say are rights there under you and your self; are “inalienable rights”
Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness
you are NOT guaranteed anything with “inalienable rights” legally
you are not guaranteed happiness just the ability to pursue it
These are right of birth not rights by government
your list would be rights under government law not “inalienable rights”
and the Declaration of Independence
is not law,, it is a statement before there was law of the land (USA)
in all reality the Declaration of Independence is a divorce decree from England and English rule and European Rule
the US Constitution is the law of the land of the United States of America
not the world
None of the above. The Declaration spoke of unalienable rights in only the most general of terms: Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. Under the US Constitution, the answer is B.
B. Right to protection against unfair imprisonment without trial
People argue that tax is unconstitutional so D is out. C is stupid. People get fired all the time.
My guess would be B.