No -- After the women arrive at the tomb, an angel rolls back the stone. Mathew (28:1-2)
or
Yes -- When they arrived, the stone had already been rolled away. Mark (16:4)
or
Yes -- When they arrived, the stone had already been taken away. Luke (24:2)
or
Yes -- When Mary arrived, the stone had already been taken away. John (20:1)
Do these guys agree on anything?
Update:2 And, behold, there was a great earthquake: for the angel of the Lord descended from heaven, and came and rolled back the stone from the door, and sat upon it.
Copyright © 2024 1QUIZZ.COM - All rights reserved.
Answers & Comments
Verified answer
No it was raining that day and they didn't want to stick around and put on there.
Pay close attention read very slow. As the women where going to the tomb an angel came down and roll the stone away. Who care if they saw it happen or not the fact is It happen.
Matthew didn't say that the stone was still there when the women arrived. Quit looking at what atheists said were contradictions in the Bible and try reading the Bible. If you can find a real contradiction (as opposed to something that you don't understand), let me know.
What difference does it make? It does not change the fact that Jesus rose from the dead and is alive!
I assume you also take umbrage with the AP and Reuters stories and photos of the "dead" in Lebanon.
So because Matthew's testament was slightly more descriptive, it's now contradictory? Can we be a little more petty?
the stone was removed.. supposedly
Yes they do. That He is risen.
Pay attention to that which will save your soul.
find your answer here http://www.stillspeaking.com/default.htm