Isn't the problem with creationist questions, that they're always asked with a «who» included?

No syllogism or logical thinking or question can go right when things are presumed from the beginning. By starting off a question with «who», Creationists are implying that someone with intentions and mental states created everything, leaving perfectly plausible options out of the equation. Natural and non-intentional phenomena could also have been the beginning of the universe, and creationists are fallaciously not including these possibilities. So: aren't Creationists committing a fallacy by excluding plausible hypotheses and presuming the intentional stance of the first cause?

Please enter comments
Please enter your name.
Please enter the correct email address.
You must agree before submitting.

Answers & Comments


Helpful Social

Copyright © 2024 1QUIZZ.COM - All rights reserved.