Since the trinity is not a biblical teaching, who knows. According to the trinity, the second part of God had a mere man baptize him so that the second part of God could present himself to the first part of God to symbolize he was ready to begin doing the first part of God's will. Then, the third part of God, sent by the first part of God came down upon the second part of God. Then the first part of God said he approved of the second part of God.
If all of these were one in the same, none of this would be necessary.
Answers & Comments
Verified answer
Since the trinity is not a biblical teaching, who knows. According to the trinity, the second part of God had a mere man baptize him so that the second part of God could present himself to the first part of God to symbolize he was ready to begin doing the first part of God's will. Then, the third part of God, sent by the first part of God came down upon the second part of God. Then the first part of God said he approved of the second part of God.
If all of these were one in the same, none of this would be necessary.
Easily God could appear as millions of people at a time if that were His will so why not three