Off the top off my head entirely, a lot of it had to do with the idea of a strong central government vs. a weaker one, and the idea of stronger powers of the executive branch and the use of them as would be more natural for a militarist type leader. Jefferson believed more in the idea of a society of maximum liberties. He also was one of the greatest radicals with his thinking along those lines. "Blood of tyrants, tree of liberty", and all of that. These were Jefferson's kind of ideas. He was entirely distrustful of the power and the possible corruptions of the state. Hamilton on the other hand was a leading General of the Revolutionary war and his mindset was quite different. He might be called an elitist of sorts. As I recall one of the largest points of contention had to do with the "Alien and Sedition Act" in the late 1790s, I think. This having to do with those in our county who favored a stronger alliance with Revolutionary France. Jefferson had sympathies for a more widespread solidarity. This was right at the time of a kind of a triangular government before Bonaparte became absolute dictator (or Emperor, pick your term.). No one was exactly sure what direction France was going to take. It all seemed very dangerous internationally in some ways. Rightfully so.
This is definitely part of the picture. Kind of a blue book closed type of answer for me. No books, no class, no computer. OK?
particularly, that they had many possibilities to return mutually, and debated their aspects various cases in cupboard conferences. They have been basically antagonistic of their ideals, so neither exchange into probably to cajole the different. Hamilton did admire Jefferson's integrity even however he did not agree together with his point of view. (He exchange into the only that desperate the election between Aaron Burr and Jefferson.)
Answers & Comments
Verified answer
Off the top off my head entirely, a lot of it had to do with the idea of a strong central government vs. a weaker one, and the idea of stronger powers of the executive branch and the use of them as would be more natural for a militarist type leader. Jefferson believed more in the idea of a society of maximum liberties. He also was one of the greatest radicals with his thinking along those lines. "Blood of tyrants, tree of liberty", and all of that. These were Jefferson's kind of ideas. He was entirely distrustful of the power and the possible corruptions of the state. Hamilton on the other hand was a leading General of the Revolutionary war and his mindset was quite different. He might be called an elitist of sorts. As I recall one of the largest points of contention had to do with the "Alien and Sedition Act" in the late 1790s, I think. This having to do with those in our county who favored a stronger alliance with Revolutionary France. Jefferson had sympathies for a more widespread solidarity. This was right at the time of a kind of a triangular government before Bonaparte became absolute dictator (or Emperor, pick your term.). No one was exactly sure what direction France was going to take. It all seemed very dangerous internationally in some ways. Rightfully so.
This is definitely part of the picture. Kind of a blue book closed type of answer for me. No books, no class, no computer. OK?
Derek
particularly, that they had many possibilities to return mutually, and debated their aspects various cases in cupboard conferences. They have been basically antagonistic of their ideals, so neither exchange into probably to cajole the different. Hamilton did admire Jefferson's integrity even however he did not agree together with his point of view. (He exchange into the only that desperate the election between Aaron Burr and Jefferson.)