Verified answer

A war with Iran would be a huge mistake. Obama will not put us at war with Iran. We have been provoking Iran, and that is not good. Iran's President is all talk. In fact, he does not even have the power to go to war. That power resides with the Ayatollah. Obama is correct that we need to talk to Iran. We need to settle this with diplomacy and/or stricter economic sanctions. McCain, on the other hand, is against that. What other options are there besides war? If we go to war with Iran, it will spark WWIII. And it will not be a pretty one. Russia, China, and probably North Korea will side with Iran. They will say enough is enough. They are tired of the US provoking and bullying other countries. When will Americans wake up and see this administration for who they truly are! Bush is no better than Hitler trying to take over the world! McCain WILL start a war with Iran. His "bomb bomb bomb bomb Iran" and 'kill Iranians with cigarettes' jokes are very disturbing. He has something going on in his mind about Iran that is just not right! So, my "big concern" is only about McCain getting in office and starting WWIII. I have no concerns over Obama handling this because he is correct. If you want peace, vote Obama. If you want war and more countries to hate us, vote McCain. It really is that simple!

Yesterday I read an article in the corriere(www.corriere.it)that the former Italian president has made a statement in reference to the CiA anbd Mossad(Israel), claiming that 9/11 was staged by those to intelligence agencies and that most of the world's intelligence agencies knew this. I already tend to believe that. I find that the Israelis do use America rather than being our allied. I've previously heard that they plan to attack Iran on Nov.5th---one day after our election is held--and I've also heard the claims that Iran produces nuclear weapons. Iran shot their "test" missiles AFTER Israel

s threat to attack them, so the aggressor in this case is not Iran, but Israel.

I've gotten to the point where I have a great dislike for the Israelis(not the Jews, but the Israeli government), because they seem to think that they are ENTITLED to the 3 billion they get from us annually, as well as the 1/2 billion which they get annually from Germany since 1948 as restitution for the holocaust. I believe that the state of Israel is not legal because they never paid for the land they took from Palestine, and I also believe that other countries like Iran have a right to do in their country whatever they see fit as long as they don't threaten no one......this entire middle east issue is only so bad because Israel is pushing--they want the land for free, they don't want to give Palestinians the same rights they have(in their own land), they want nuclear power(they got it from us), but they want to dictate other countries that they can't have them, they want 3 billion dollars in aid each year, they want the Germans to pay permanently, so they have us revisit the holocaust every year---when are the Israelis gonna stop? I am tired of them---the Middle East would get along with each other was it not for the Israelis......

So, I guess Mr. Sharansky is equally pissed-off at George Bush for taking up Senator Obama's call for having a line of communication open with Iran?

it rather isn't any secret that something of the midsection East is intimidated/worrying by skill of Iran and its unpredictability. it rather is one reason Hussein became so tolerated in Iraq, with the aid of fact he stood as much as Iran and that that they had a capability tug-of-conflict that hung directly to what peace the area had. it incredibly is likewise why invasion of Iraq and removing of Hussein became so unpopular between different center eastern international locations, with the aid of fact with him long gone, Iran might make a grab for capability. possibly Saudi Arabia now realizes that the enemy of her enemy is her buddy, and can rather see Iran worn out then an entire center eastern conflict.

Sharansky is entitled to his opinion. I don't really think he has a realistic view of things, though, since he claims that Obama said he'd negotiate with Ahmadinajad. Obama did not say that. He said he would consider talking with Iran. That would NOT involve Ahmadinajad who is only incharge of domestic issues and has absolutely no role whatsoever in the foreign policy of Iran. If Sharansky doesn't know that he is a fool.

Israel needs to grow up and learn to coexist with the Islams,

they want us to use our forces and money to wipe them all off the planet for them~!!!

we have had thousands of Nuclear Warheads aimed at us for a long time, we deal with it very day, let them deal with it, and if Iran does attack they know they are History~!!!

their is a documented list of countries that Israel wants the United Stated to wipe out for them, it starts with Iraq and Afghanistan, anf includes Iran and Syria next, plus quite a few more, including China~!!!

I think Mr. Sharansky is very intuitive concerning Obama:

Sharansky thinks Obama has “a little record or almost no record, while the one who he is competing with is McCain, and we know for sure his principles.”

Sharansky continues the train of thought: “It is very alarming for me the way Senator Obama voted, the way he spoke about his desire to negotiate with Ahmadinejad, and the way some of his advisers think.

“I was at AIPAC. He made a very strong speech, speaking about a Jewish state, defensible borders, a united Jerusalem, then the next day he started correcting himself.”

uuuuuum way to pick an unbiased source... I was born in Russia... we all know these self-proclaimed "dissidents"... they honestly just yap their mouth for no reason... I'm not taking a single word of his Zionist ideology seriously... too biased, too extremist, too unreliable... sorry, bad source....