Verified answer

American troops are not killing Iraqi civilians.

I think Bush is trying to give OUR freedom to Iraq.

it's amusing that bush and his supporters worry more about freedom in iraq than quality of life in this country. if he had spent a few bucks(compared to the war cost) on medical care and education for americans, he could have chased his oil.

when i have mentioned this before, all i got was cons telling me that libs want the gov't to care for them cradle to the grave. telling me to get a job, etc.

yeah, chimpboy is a piece of work, indeed.

no.

What's the point of bringing freedom if they are not alive to enjoy it.

And this war is about bush's oil profits, personal matters, and defending middle east policy.

All that should come second to national interest and security.

The democrats are in for the long haul also. If you don't believe me, wait to see what they do when they have the opportunity to end the war.

I think it is a tragedy. From both sides.

Bush is the greatest disaster to land on earth since Adolf Hitler. He is, essentially, Hitler without a brain.

Meanwhile, your numbers are a little off the mark. There are nearly 4,000 dead young Americans as a result of Bush's illegal, unprovoked invasion of Iraq and approximately 30,000 seriously maimed.

Democrats and liberals, as shown by this question and many answers, certainly have a tough time living in the real world. Wait...my mistake! They don't have clue what the "real world" is.

Given their choice regarding vacation versus working to fix their country, I'd say it is the type of freedom they merit.

I see no problem with killing them all. When you consider that we are accused of just being over there for the oil, once we whack them all, we can skim off all the oil without anyone stopping us.

true dat.