Verified answer

B (clinton's party) made real prosperity. A just rode B's prosperity and then pointed fingers when they crashed it.

I don't know - did you like the dotcom explosion that created wealth during the 1990s? It turned out to be like a house made of sticks and straw, didn't it?

Did you like the Republican Congress from 1995 - 2006, which had a cumulative deficit of less than one year's deficit under the current Democrat Congress?

Four years of Democrats in control - how's that going?

well the Republicans took over congress in 1994. When Bush became president, there was a surplus. Democrats took over in 2006, and less than two years later, the economy almost collapsed again, even though Bush took all the heat.

Neither

They pursue prosperity differently, republicans do it over time similar to a blue chip stock, liberals want everything right now and that comes with risk.

A. During the 1990s, we had a balanced budget under the Republican Congress.

I see you put Clinton and not Obama. Sneaky because you know how much Obama is spending. He is spending faster than any president ever has. Hes the worst. I would say neither party is good. But Obama is the worst so I'll say A.

Economically speaking, both parties have failed. Not until America elects a miserable miser will our economic woes be resolved.