Dana Perino says atheists “don’t have to live here” if they oppose the Pledge. What do you think?

Here's the back story: The American Humanists Association in Massachusetts brought a suit saying the Pledge - with the words "under God" violates the state's Equal Protection amendment.

Fox News pundit Dana Perino said she's "tired" of atheists attempting to remove the phrase "under God" from the Pledge of Allegiance, adding, "if these people really don't like it, they don't have to live here."

http://religion.blogs.cnn.com/2013/09/09/fox-news-...

How do you feel about this? As an atheist, I am highly offended, as you might guess. But I want to know what you think. I'm especially curious to hear opinions from religious folks.

Update:

@Mark: You're response is both wrong, and ignorant.

First of all, removing someone who objects to the pledge is akin to punishing them. It's a form of alienation and discrimination. Furthermore, it reinforces the idea that you are a second-class citizen by not allowing you to participate in a patriotic display because you object to those two words.

Secondly, you confuse the fact that America is a nation with a Christian majority for it being a Christian nation. Last time I checked, there is nothing in the Constitution which specifies a national religion, or even suggests the US is based on Christian values. The idea we are a Christian nation also ignores the fact the some of our nation's first settlers came here seeking religious freedom from England and their state religion.

Thirdly, you obviously don't understand that "under God" is a recent addition to the Pledge (1954), just as the addition of "In God We Trust" to our currency is relatively

Please enter comments
Please enter your name.
Please enter the correct email address.
You must agree before submitting.

Answers & Comments


Helpful Social

Copyright © 2024 1QUIZZ.COM - All rights reserved.