Since Jesus was not a father-son descendant of King David then he is not of the Davidic dynasty and thus could not be the Messiah by that criteria alone.

Adoption does not confer any legal status.

False.

It's like asking,

David could not have fulfilled his mission as King of Israel unless he was from the king-line of Saul. True/false?

Yes, from the line of David, from the tribe of Judah, "The lion of Judah".  But the "kingdom" is the church, Col. 1:13, a spiritual kingdom, 2 Pet. 1:11, and not a worldly, military one.  "My kingdom is not from hence", John 18:36.

All I know.

Whatever was written, said, seen. Was about black people.

I don't give a chit what those religious books says.👁️

I don't believe and I SEE.

the priests who wrote these texts, of course, were hardly independent, unbiased observers -- their livelihood and that of their entire family and house depended on them being accepted as true.  Since we have zero objective means to corroborate such claims ... i rate them all, from all major religions, as questionable -- the subject of faith, not reason.

I believe most evangelicals would say TRUE, don't know how others like the JW would view that, I would assume that for ONCE they would agree.

The divinity of Christ was decided by a committee chaired by Constantine the Great, a man who murdered his own child and wife.

Yes.  Absolutely correct.