As many people know the current BCS Bowl games are NCG: Ohio State-LSU, Orange Bowl: Kansas-Virginia Tech, Fiesta Bowl: Oklahoma-West Virginia, Sugar Bowl: Hawaii-Georgia, Rose Bowl: USC-Illinois. Personally other then the Kansas-Virginia Tech game (although I expect Kansas to win), all the games look like locks to me (LSU will crush Ohio State, Oklahoma will crush West Virginia, Georgia will crush Hawaii, and USC will crush Illinois). All these bad matchups are why the system is largely flawed, I think that, if the BCS can’t have a playoff (although I would be quite happy with one) then they should not lock the BCS winners in to certain bowls. Thus we could have (with an adjusted BCS formula) NCG: Oklahoma-LSU, Orange Bowl: USC-Georgia, Fiesta Bowl: Ohio State-Missouri, West Virginia-Hawaii, and Virginia Tech-Kansas. All these matchups will bring in more revenue to the schools, and give exciting well fought games to the fans.
Answers & Comments
Verified answer
The current BCS games suck. No game is going to be competitive. I like ur match ups better.
well I remember everyone saying last year that
Ohio State would be Florida
Notre Dame was good
Oklahoma WOULD DESTROY Boise State
among other things
so ready your rants, makes me want to watch these games even more, because the ones we thought were going to win, NEVER DO.....especially after a season like this
you have the same teams playing in the different games....why would more money go to them!?!?
the bcs does not pick who should be in bowl games, that is left up to teh bowl selection committee, all the bcs does is rank teams.
How do you figure more revenue? There will be just as many fans, no matter the match up.
well I wish that could happen but it won't because of the stupid BCS
I agree with your proposed changes...Now what????