Stand in front of the mirror and wait until you don't recognize yourself. Is that enhancing planned change?
Someone has sold you a bag of goods. We tell ourselves who we are all the time and if you throw away the script instead of ENHANCING the folklore you are having an identity crisis, which is not good for the bottom line. Of course I ist actually has an identity crisis, they just don't like who they see in the mirror, and that is negative folklore, not the "problem of". If you treat your organizations past self-image as "baggage" that baggage will hold you back forever. Gotta work with what you got.
In a world where change is the order, in order to exist, an agency, while still holding on to its customary beliefs and folk traditions, must also change. An agency cannot remain intransigent to the order of its world, and neither can it change so radically that its very essence is lost.
Adrift the flux of change, an agency's reliance of its folklore, to improve its self-image, is understanding and appreciable. It will always be the first choice, always an impedance to any other means or imperatives, to the extent, that its ideals are valid, and its beliefs tenable.
The fact is an agency's desire to improve its self-image through its reliance on its folklore already suggests the agency realises its need to change, the impedance therefore comes from agency's adherence to its ideals, to its gods. One way to combat such intransigence inherent to a culture or society is, if ideals cannot be changed then they can be redefined and re-understood, thereby creating new myths and folklore.
True ideals will never become obsolete. They will always be source of new sense and meanings for their believers with which to understand their world, always enabling them to develop and evolve in the face of any extent of change, but in their own peculiar way.
Please give due consideration to it from philosophic angles only.
It depends on the efficiency of the computer and the input. If the data is correct, the computer will process the information in no time and send the output.
Answers & Comments
It would depend on the agency and how their reliance moves their actions.
There cannot be a hard and fast rule on this.
it sets limits on it's desired change and growth based on this self image
Stand in front of the mirror and wait until you don't recognize yourself. Is that enhancing planned change?
Someone has sold you a bag of goods. We tell ourselves who we are all the time and if you throw away the script instead of ENHANCING the folklore you are having an identity crisis, which is not good for the bottom line. Of course I ist actually has an identity crisis, they just don't like who they see in the mirror, and that is negative folklore, not the "problem of". If you treat your organizations past self-image as "baggage" that baggage will hold you back forever. Gotta work with what you got.
In a world where change is the order, in order to exist, an agency, while still holding on to its customary beliefs and folk traditions, must also change. An agency cannot remain intransigent to the order of its world, and neither can it change so radically that its very essence is lost.
Adrift the flux of change, an agency's reliance of its folklore, to improve its self-image, is understanding and appreciable. It will always be the first choice, always an impedance to any other means or imperatives, to the extent, that its ideals are valid, and its beliefs tenable.
The fact is an agency's desire to improve its self-image through its reliance on its folklore already suggests the agency realises its need to change, the impedance therefore comes from agency's adherence to its ideals, to its gods. One way to combat such intransigence inherent to a culture or society is, if ideals cannot be changed then they can be redefined and re-understood, thereby creating new myths and folklore.
True ideals will never become obsolete. They will always be source of new sense and meanings for their believers with which to understand their world, always enabling them to develop and evolve in the face of any extent of change, but in their own peculiar way.
Please give due consideration to it from philosophic angles only.
It depends on the efficiency of the computer and the input. If the data is correct, the computer will process the information in no time and send the output.
It would depend on the agency and how their reliance moves their actions.
There cannot be a hard and fast rule on this.