No he was not. He was found 'not guilty'. That does not mean innocent. It means the state could not prove its case beyond a reasonable doubt. He was later convicted of a serious felony and is disqualified from serving as any kind of judge. Lousy trolling attempt, pal.
Answers & Comments
he would fit right in. they are both assholes
He's going to abolish the Supreme Court.
He might be.
Obviously not. In the civil trial, Simpson lost everything he owned. So his peers found against him.
He wasn't in his second criminal trial and is now a convicted felon, so no.
Weirdly a dead woman could provide more evidence than the whole democratic party
No. Attorney General.
No he was not. He was found 'not guilty'. That does not mean innocent. It means the state could not prove its case beyond a reasonable doubt. He was later convicted of a serious felony and is disqualified from serving as any kind of judge. Lousy trolling attempt, pal.
Nope
why so racist?