How much information can/should be shared with law enforcement? This issue arises more than you might imagine.
Consider this scenario: Bob has several outstanding warrants for his arrest. Unfortunately, Bob is involved in a motor vehicle crash and sustains significant injuries. Upon arriving to the crash site, law enforcement learns that Bob is suspected of three felonies; however, Bob needs immediate medical care and is taken to the nearest hospital for emergency surgery. Law enforcement knows that if they arrest Bob in the hospital, Bob must have an officer with him at all times while hospitalized AND the jurisdiction making the arrest becomes responsible for Bob's medical care costs. Law enforcement decides to wait until Bob is discharged to make an arrest; however, Bob's significant other makes Bob a "no information" patient (in other words, no one can know if Bob is in or out of the hospital). Law enforcement calls the nursing unit and asks the nurse to notify law enforcement when Bob is discharged so that an arrest can be made. (This prevents the need for an officer to be with Bob in the hospital AND prevents the jurisdiction from becoming responsible for Bob's medical bills.)
QUESTIONS FOR DISCUSSION: (1) According to patient confidentiality laws, what information are you allowed to share with law enforcement? (2) Do your legal obligations conflict with your personal moral compass? Why or why not?
Copyright © 2024 1QUIZZ.COM - All rights reserved.
Answers & Comments
An ESSENTIAL premise of your question is a LIE. An officer WOULD NOT be required to be with him at all times, and the jurisdiction WOULD NOT be responsible for ANY of the medical costs related to the crash.
Bob's 'significant other' CAN'T make him a 'no information patient' and the hospital MUST inform law enforcement before discharge per the COURT ORDER that will be issued.
QUESTION FOR DISCUSSION: Why can't you do your own homework just like the rest of us did? And you want a "discussion" answer? Laughable.
One hint - it is NOT true that the "jurisdiction making the arrest" is responsible for Bob's medical costs. You can't possibly believe that is true.
It is, likewise, not true that if Bob is arrested there must be an Officer with him at all times in the hospital. Ever go into a hospital ward with patients handcuffed to the beds?
Otherwise, sounds like junior high school homework. What does MY personal "moral compass" have to do with the law?