Given that ∈=1/2, Prove there exists a δ>0 such that if |x-3|< δ, then |x^2-9|<∈.
Please go step by step because i dont understand. Can you also state what kind of proof you are using (ie direct, contrapositive, counterexample, induction etc).
Copyright © 2024 1QUIZZ.COM - All rights reserved.
Answers & Comments
Verified answer
Note that |x^2 - 9|
= |x - 3| |x + 3|
= |x - 3| |(x - 3) + 6|
≤ |x - 3| [|x - 3| + |6|], by triangle inequality
= |x - 3|^2 + 6 |x - 3|
< |x - 3| + 6|x - 3|, assuming that |x - 3| < 1
= 7|x - 3|.
So given ε > 0, let δ = min {1, ε/7}.
Then, |x - 3| < δ ==> |x^2 - 9| < 7|x - 3| < 7(ε/7) = ε.
I hope this helps!
This subject has a lot of blind alleys, yet one thank you to tutor this is to evaluate a rational fraction of the style: a/(an-b) the place n > a > b are integers. Subtracting a million/n from it, we've: a/(an-b) - a million/n = (an - an + b)/(n(an-b)) = b/(an² - bn) the place we replace an² - bn with bn' - c, the place b > c. to that end, we've a the rest fraction the place b < a, and this technique may well be repeated until we are left with a fragment of the style a million/n'', and the algorithmic technique ends with a finite sum of fractions. it is going to be reported that for any given rational fraction 0 < x < a million, there's a multiplicity of strategies that's expressed interior the style a million/a + a million/b + a million/c + ..., the place a, b, c... are all diverse integers. This subject jogs my memory of Turing's Halting subject, in that what we are being asked to do is to tutor that if we subtract fractions of the style a million/n successively from the unique rational fraction, the technique will halt finally. this is style of exciting to objective doing it employing random fractions, finally it halt with each and every so often some enormously some distance out fractions. Addendum: If for any reason in the process the algorithmic technique we arise with 2 fractions that are alike, we are in a position to apply amir11elad's technique of changing between the fractions with 2 others, and if that motives yet another tournament, we are in a position to repeat, until after a finite variety of step there'll be no greater desirable fits and each and all the fractions could be diverse. Addendum 2: right here is the information returned, greater concisely: a million) Subtract fractions of the style a million/n from the rational selection 0 < x < a million successively (with diverse n) until we are left with a fragment of the style a/(an-b), the place n > a > b are integers. 2) Subtract a million/n from this fraction, so as that we are left with a fragment of the style b/(bn-c), the place n > b > c are integers. 3) proceed until we are left with the fraction of the style a million/n. in case you have a chain of integers a > b > c > ...., finally, you will finally end up with a million. this is why the sequence will constantly be finite. Addendum 3: pay attention ye, Alexey V
This difficulty has a large style of blind alleys, yet one thank you to coach it particularly is to contemplate a rational fraction of the type: a/(an-b) the place n > a > b are integers. Subtracting a million/n from it, we've: a/(an-b) - a million/n = (an - an + b)/(n(an-b)) = b/(an² - bn) the place we replace an² - bn with bn' - c, the place b > c. for this reason, we've a the rest fraction the place b < a, and this technique would nicely be repeated until we are left with a fragment of the type a million/n'', and the algorithmic technique ends with a finite sum of fractions. it particularly is going to be pronounced that for any given rational fraction 0 < x < a million, there's a multiplicity of strategies it particularly is expressed interior the type a million/a + a million/b + a million/c + ..., the place a, b, c... are all diverse integers. This difficulty jogs my memory of Turing's Halting difficulty, in that what we are being asked to do is to coach that if we subtract fractions of the type a million/n successively from the unique rational fraction, the approach will halt ultimately. it particularly is style of exciting to objective doing it making use of random fractions, ultimately it halt with each so often some noticeably far out fractions. Addendum: If for any reason for the period of the algorithmic technique we arise with 2 fractions that are alike, we are able to apply amir11elad's approach of changing between the fractions with 2 others, and if that motives yet another tournament, we are able to repeat, until after a finite style of step there will be no extra beneficial fits and all of the fractions could be diverse. Addendum 2: this is the info returned, extra concisely: a million) Subtract fractions of the type a million/n from the rational type 0 < x < a million successively (with diverse n) until we are left with a fragment of the type a/(an-b), the place n > a > b are integers. 2) Subtract a million/n from this fraction, so as that we are left with a fragment of the type b/(bn-c), the place n > b > c are integers. 3) proceed until we are left with the fraction of the type a million/n. in case you have a team of integers a > b > c > ...., ultimately, you will finally end up with a million. it particularly is why the sequence will consistently be finite. Addendum 3: hear ye, Alexey V