Verified answer

“Beksiński was adamant that even he did not know the meaning of his artworks and was uninterested in possible interpretations; in keeping with this, he refused to provide titles for any of his drawings or paintings.”

“Beksiński avoided concrete analyses of the content of his work, saying "I cannot conceive of a sensible statement on painting". He was especially dismissive of those who sought or offered simple answers to what his work 'meant'.”

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zdzis%C5%82aw_Beksi%C...

Underneath the picture of horse and rider the text reads:

“Beksinski never gave names to his works, many of which can be found in the book, The Fantastic Art of Zdsislaw Beksinski.”

http://www.cherrybombed.com/2008/02/the-beautiful-...

Though Beksinski depicted foreboding, dark images, he always resisted attempts to analyze their meaning.
 "It misses the point to ask me what my paintings mean," he once said. "Simply, I do not know myself. Moreover, I am not at all interested in knowing." …. (Tittles would only serve to close interpretations that would otherwise be open.)

http://www.visionaryrevue.com/webtext0/bek.death.h...

Zdzislaw Beksinski Paintings

you can check out this site: http://culture.pl/en/artist/zdzislaw-beksinski

while being a painter, he was also a photographer - you can check his works here: http://culture.pl/en/gallery/zdzislaw-beksinski-se...

beksinski designed Count Chocula. Not just the cartoon character, but the recipe as well.