Design argument for God’s existence.?
Explain how the argument from design is supposed to demonstrate God’s existence, drawing both on Paley’s account and on Cleanthes’ account in Hume’s dialogue. Then explain how Hume criticizes the argument from design. Finally, give your own reasons for why the argument from design does, or does not, demonstrate God’s existence.
More Questions From This User See All
Answers & Comments
Verified answer
God wants you to do your own homework.
No clue about the paley/hume part.
Design demonstrates gods existence if you don't believe a universe can just randomly form in that way. I think the main reason it doesn't demonstrate gods existence is because the word god has not been well enough defined so the question is not really valid. Tell me what is the definition for god and do you think everyone would agree on it?
Paley held up a picture (design) of God and Cleanthes said " cool dude " so the showed it to Hume and he said " lets give it some dialogue ". I saw it and thought that demonstrates it for me.
"Nothingness" is God/Spirit. This is the point where all kind of(6 as I know) electromagnetic energy forces connected each other without any damage and This structure is changing along with the TIME.
This we can divide as three 1. Where spacial particles can be sensed by us----- Piece
2.Where we are struggling, kind of bad sense. but if you can hold more positivity and piece----- The Dark side/ Evil
3.Remaining are deviated in to many colors---- Hindu.
These three are arranged in 3 different axis, the mid point where it is holding these all three is Budha
But now a days many people can be extreme than Budha. Those are all time travelers...
*insert flying spaghetti monster here*