You can obviously get a triangle (not one of the choices) cutting parallel to the triangular faces (or at an angle).
You can also get a rectangle (as you noted) by cutting parallel to a rectangular face.
Since the ends are parallel, if you cut from one triangular face to the other, but *not* parallel to a rectangular face, the result will be a trapezoid.
There is no way to slice through 6 separate edges to get the vertices of a hexagon.
Any section cutting three faces is a triangle. There are many ways to effect that.
If it is a right prism, then a section parallel to one of the lateral faces is a rectangle.
Each side of the section is the intersection of the cutting plane and a face of the given solid. The solid has only five faces, so a hexagonal section is not possible.
Follow-up:
I beg your pardon. That second case calls for a trapezoid, not necessarily a rectangle. In that case, let the cutting plane intersect both bases and only two of the lateral faces. It intersects the bases on parallel line segments, so the section is a trapezoid. It is not necessary for it to be a right prism.
Answers & Comments
Verified answer
You can obviously get a triangle (not one of the choices) cutting parallel to the triangular faces (or at an angle).
You can also get a rectangle (as you noted) by cutting parallel to a rectangular face.
Since the ends are parallel, if you cut from one triangular face to the other, but *not* parallel to a rectangular face, the result will be a trapezoid.
There is no way to slice through 6 separate edges to get the vertices of a hexagon.
Answer:
a) Rectangle
b) Trapezoid
If you slice through its triangular cross section it could be B a trapezoid.
Assuming the "slicing" is done by a plane.
All rectangles are trapezoids, right?
Can you make a non-rectangular trapezoid also? Yes. Just make a rectangle and rotate about a side on the triangular face.
Hexagon is not possible as there are only 5 faces (each face can make at most one edge when cut with another plane).
Also possible are triangles, some irregular quadrilaterals, and pentagons.
Any section cutting three faces is a triangle. There are many ways to effect that.
If it is a right prism, then a section parallel to one of the lateral faces is a rectangle.
Each side of the section is the intersection of the cutting plane and a face of the given solid. The solid has only five faces, so a hexagonal section is not possible.
Follow-up:
I beg your pardon. That second case calls for a trapezoid, not necessarily a rectangle. In that case, let the cutting plane intersect both bases and only two of the lateral faces. It intersects the bases on parallel line segments, so the section is a trapezoid. It is not necessary for it to be a right prism.