A rational examination of the origins and sources of religion, as well as the benefits and disadvantages of religion, is unlikely to change the mind of anyone who is afraid to examine these concepts objectively.
People who approach the subject of religion with trepidation or who cannot distinguish between reality and superstition, find it difficult to apply logic to their thought processes. It is much easier to belief in miracles and pseudo-science than to acquire facts and engage in incisive, rational thought.
We can observe many members of society who appear to be intelligent and rational in the pursuit of their daily life. However, on Sundays they go to their church or temple. There they participate in incomprehensible and irrational rituals involving magic, prayer and other activities demeaning to their rational minds. Their rational mind tells them that a god does not exist and yet, there they sit and pray to him.
It has been suggested that religious people compartmentalize their thought processes in order to avoid otherwise inevitable and destructive conflicts. In this manner, rational and irrational thought processes can coexist in separate, locked compartments of the brain without connectivity. Yet, one wonders if there is some inevitable leakage from the irrational to the rational compartment, surreptitiously contaminating rationality.
Even some bright people may feel too frightened to face life without the consolations of a religion, cult or sect. Their upbringing has imbued in them the belief that it is safer not to subject the teachings of one’s church or temple or mosque to close scrutiny. Furthermore, becoming an agnostic or atheist can cut one off from the comfort and companionship of co-believers in a religion. This potentially damaging consequence of doubting one’s belief system is a strong deterrent to questioning deeply imbedded religious beliefs.
Religion may also satisfy an irrational human need for cosmic significance. Some persons yearn to be more than the grain of sand in the vastness of the universe that man really is. As long as men and women feel week and insignificant in the face of awe-inspiring natural forces, logic will not be as important as religion and man will prefer the sanctuary of imaginary, all-powerful beings.
Thus, people tend to associate in communities of like-minded people. Believers restrict their circle of friend and family to other believers. They surround themselves with mirror images of themselves.
If people wear blinders successfully, then the young and naïve among them hear nothing but the desired belief. No reputable person in his or her sphere of life ever disagrees with or objects to the tenets of their common belief system. As time goes on, people in a mentally incestuous society consider it normal that all seemingly intelligent people believe as the community believes.
When a believer encounters non-believers, the shock may be great. The believer asks, "How can they not believe? Doesn’t everyone believe?" The believing community usually provides a convenient answer to that question: The non-believers are evil or they are possessed by an evil power. If you hang around them enough it might be contagious.
As a result, the believer becomes paranoid and afraid of non-believers, because he fails to understand that non-believers do not need to believe in anything. Non-believers rely on reason, logic and the factual evidence of the real world.
Instead, the believer sees non-believers as abnormal and undesirable. Thus, religious belief maintains itself through self-affirmation, insulation and demonization of non-believers.
The archaic belief systems of religion and the supernatural are the dominion of primitive, prehistoric man. Modern man is engaged in the accelerating process of replacing religion and superstition with science and rationality. I hope Superstition and religion will eventually disappear in the dustbin of human history.
Copyright © 2024 1QUIZZ.COM - All rights reserved.
Answers & Comments
Verified answer
WTF who do you think is going to read all that?
I shouldnt respond to this. You are going to blow my good rating because this isnt really a question looking for a "best answer". Maybe if I just agree with you?
Nahh cant do that.
OK I understand what you wish. But seriously, look at the common man. Yes there are many who have faith and superstition based on some religion thing that someone preached them or they read in a book. And then there are many who have faith and superstition in some science thing that someone preached them or they read in a book. Is your problem with the fact that they just accept on faith? or is your problem with what they have faith in?
Are you truly scientific or just a preacher of science? Can you step back and look at them equally or are you guilty of what you are angry at? Go back thru what you just wrote and try reading it as if it was about science. Im NOT disagreeing with you. I just wonder if you can look at it scientifically. How is the common mans faith in science different? Is it arrived at by rational thought? I dont mean the science, but the individual mans belief in it. All of the perceived benefits and problems appear the same to me. Including, the danger of fanaticism.
So as far as your final wish that superstition and religion disappear? I doubt it unless someday the entire race become true scientists. But it might be replaced by superstition and religion toward something you would find more comfortable. :)
Well said.
I like your theory of compartmentalization. I had formerly convinced myself that almost nobody really believed in God, because this was evident through their actions. If someone really thought that a non-believer was going to be unimaginably tortured for all eternity, they'd be screaming their lungs out on streetcorners during every waking moment, desperately pleading with strangers to save them from such a horrible fate.
The compartmentalization theory sits better with me than the "nobody believes" idea. The idea that nobody believes in God always seemed a bit masturbatory and self-reassuring to me; an inversion of theists' "everybody believes, but atheists are just mad at God" theory.
Woooow that'¿s a looong rant. It IS a rant because it's anything BUT a question. Therefore... 2 pts.
Brevity is the soul of wit!
Lack of evidence, and science.
Well said... but I expect you'll get a lot of tl;dr.
If I am a dummkopf I would believe in a schmuck.
So, you just answered your own question?
Anyway, I agree with you.
i see a wall of text and my eyes hurt.
they are hipsters, they want to be different