I calculated dy/dx to be
1 / [t (1+t)²]
but when dy/dx = 0... its impossible?? b/c 1 can never be 0, and isnt the only way the function can be 0 if the numerator turns to 0?
Also,
"Suppose the graph of y = f(x), where f is a differentiable function, has a horizontal asymptote (say, with lim (x -> inf) y = c, for some real number c). Would you expect that lim (x -> inf) (dy/dx) = 0?
I don't know what this question is asking? So if we graph y = (t - 1)/ (t+1), then there is a horizontal asymptote at y = 1 right? then I WOULDN'T expect lim (x -> inf) (dy/dx) = 0 but 1 instead right??
Doesn't the above question basically ask, what is lim (x -> inf) (dy/dx)? Isn't it 1?
Thanks.
Update:pls help... thanks a lot!! i'll give u guys 10 pts promptly!!
Copyright © 2024 1QUIZZ.COM - All rights reserved.
Answers & Comments
Verified answer
1) Your dy/dx is correct, and indeed this parametric function never has dy/dx=0 (in other words, it has no local minimum or maximum)
2) The question asks: if a function approaches a flat horizontal line at infinity, what happens to its derivative at infinity?
Well, you know that the derivative of a flat line is 0: y(x)=C → dy/dx=0
Another way to see that is to realize that if a function approaches a flat asymptote, it changes less and less and less as x tends to infinity. At infinity, it will completely stop changing (and the change of a function is its derivative; namely dy/dx will become 0)
In your case, if x→+∞, t also →+∞, and
lim {t→+∞} dy/dx = lim {t→+∞} 1/[ t(1+t)² ] = 1/+∞ = 0
1) dy/dx is zero only when x is negative infinity. It will not be zero for any real value of x. What you did is correct.
2) If there is a horizontal asymptote for y = f(x) at x = 1, that means that lim (x-> inf) y = 1. You mixed up y and dy/dx. To find lim (x-> inf) dy/dx, find the limit of its derivative that you have found earlier as x approaches infinity. You will notice that this will be 0. The limits of y and dy/dx are not the same.
Hope this helps.