May 2021 2 61 Report
Wouldn't the PA courts be familiar with the term "exigent circumstance"? CV-19 created a well precedented but unforeseen health emergency. ?

This health emergency was exacerbated by the rump administration's decision NOT to act decisively and appropriately to stem the infection rate. So the PA Secretary of State (as well as many others) made mail in absentee ballots an option for every citizen in that common wealth. The delivery of the mail in ballots was slowed, either deliberately by the USPS Postmaster General's decision to, w/o replacement, decommission and disassemble large numbers of mail sorting equipment. This is a well known and well publicized string of occurrences outside the control of the voters of the common wealth. Dershowitz's argument, for the votes of the citizens of the common wealth of PA to be discounted due to the manipulations of the machinations of rump's effort to get reelected are NOT in the public interests of the voters of any state or commonwealth. To take the issue to a venue for adjudication and with one's very next breath state that adjudicating body violated separation powers is senseless. The rump campaign took the late ballot issue to the courts to argue that the common wealth's Secretary of State broke the law in allowing late ballots to be counted. The common wealth's Secretary of State argued exigent circumstances, with which the courts agreed. The next ironically illogical steps in the process are to take it to ostensibly and successively higher and higher levels of the same adjudicating branch of government that the campaign says isn't allowed to make a decision on the case.

Please enter comments
Please enter your name.
Please enter the correct email address.
You must agree before submitting.

Answers & Comments


Helpful Social

Copyright © 2024 1QUIZZ.COM - All rights reserved.