why do religionist’s literalize mythology instead of indulging in the deeper allegorial and ?

Please don't ignore this because it's so extended. Please I'm trying to learn as best as I can even if its detailed and dumbed down.

I’ve been thinking for some time now, why has mental evolution become stagnated in the posture of religionist’s? The facination with ancient Egyptian thought and its plethora of mystery schools around the ancient world is breath taking. The achievments of the Egyptians and Greeks have astounded me all my life with their mathmematical, scientific, astronomical, and philosophical contour yet, an obvious gap is discernable. Particualrly dealing with the Egyptian mystery systems, there were two distinct categorizations of its degrees-the greater light and the lesser light. The former dealt with the inner-mysteries by the student and the later dealt with the exoteric dimmensions of reality.These dualistic pillars were designed to transcend one from the shallow end of the pool[sort a speak] into the more abysmal portion of ones understanding. Through tedious research, what was thought to be just another religious organization was really a university of the higher arts-science, math, astronomy, music, etc..veiled in superstitious garment, a facade to detract the ones who weren’t worthy of higher accredations.Those initiates who never penatrated the "Greater Light" [and reasons vary] remained stringent in the exoteric interpretation of what was revealed in the "Lesser Light". I look at believers as neophytes [beginners] who have never evolved from the "Lesser Light" yet have gained more militant might, more monetary appropriation’s, and have won the popularity contest regarding the sufficiency of just-belief [this was why Europe fell into the dark ages for 200yrs b/c of their refusal to accept the validations for the scientific community through religious hate crimes].

My question is, what has prevented religionist’s from seeking the "The Greater Light" [reason] being that, when we indulge in the historicity of Christanity in particular, the reason for its infantile perspective in modernity was that it abrogated the very aspects then, that it denies today? It would seem that the definition of insanity comes to mind...doing the same thing over and over again, yet expecting a different result.

I'll make it shorter by In other words, why do religionist’s literalize mythology instead of indulging in the deeper allegorial and metaphysical interpretations of their theology which would lead to more reasoned based reality? Is it easier to believe in aspects that have nostalgic like elements than to comprehend what’s behind the curtain [even though it might be boring...lol]?

The idea intended is to exemplify the facade of exoteric religion as it relates to its esoteric counterpart. My point is that mystery [especially pertaining to nature] breeds fear when not properly understood, especially in the mind of primitive man. What was once seen as demon possession was explained by medical conditions later. What was once perceived as spirit was then understood as various levels of energy manifesting itself. What was once seen as god’s wrath upon man was explained through methodological naturalism. These examples are what I mean by "greater light" and "lesser light". The latter dealt with the literalism of ocular perception and the former with a deeper mathematical, scientific, astronomical, etc...explanation that went beyond just the surface understanding [this concept was mentioned in my post by the way].

Spirituality is not a matter of intelligence or lack thereof...proponents of systematic theology would disagree with you such as Karl Rahner, Karl Barth, Paul Tillich, even Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger (now Pope Benedict XVI) just to name a few.

Atheists attempt to see God from the perspective of man: empirical evidence, yet not one theory of consequence related to the existence or non existence of God has been proven, beyond a reasonable doubt. Therefore I say atheism leads to little so can theism Atheism is not the central theme nor a theme at all for that matter concerning this post; its actually systematically theistic in posture.

My point is simplistic and coherent with asking the question, what makes religionist stagnant in acquiring a more thorough understanding of life instead of leaving it up to a mystical apparition where you gotta have faith becomes the scapegoat. Personally, I believe it is man’s own lethargic behavior that prevents him from mastering himself, not that we are incapable of such a feat by not accessing a subjective phantasmic spectacle.

As written in the Temple of Apollo at Delphi, "man, know thyself".

Please enter comments
Please enter your name.
Please enter the correct email address.
You must agree before submitting.

Answers & Comments


Helpful Social

Copyright © 2024 1QUIZZ.COM - All rights reserved.