Verified answer

This is an area about which there is much confusion.

The culture is hypothetical and based upon linguistic studies. It is called Proto-Indo-European. It dates from the fifth millennium BCE. This culture may have been the source of the concept of the Aryans.

This seems to be the bases for all Indic languages, including Sanskrit and Hindi, the Iranian languages, including Pashto, Kurdish and Persian, Hellenic Greek, Armenian and Albanian, the Latin languages, Celtic, Germanic, including Yiddish, and the Balto-Slavic languages.

The Skandazza as old Skandinávia is much more recent and is based upon the Scandinavian settlement and expansion of the Vikings during the Eighth to Eleventh Centuries. This has more to do with the concept of the Northmen (Norse). This accounts for the Blue eyed, Blonde hair mythos.

These people were called the Danes oe Dene by the Anglo-Saxons, the Lochlanach by the Irish and the Ascomanni by the Germans. In the south they were called the Varangians in the Byzantine Empire and were also known as the Rhōs or Rus' from which the word Russian was derived.

Most of these old theories are obsoleted by the latest FINDINGS of molecular biology and archeology. The NEW theories postulate that modern H. sapiens came "out of Africa" about half a million years ago, and migrated all over the globe. Some theorize they were the first humans; but others propose that they superseded other populations of Homos wherever they went. This original set of people differentiated morphologically and physiologically in order to survive in the diverse geo-climatic situations. Mutuations arose enabling such adaptation. Albinoism was one such mutation that gave survival advantage in cold climes like Skandinavia. The story of subsequent migrations is not of uniform direction or succession of types. Much mingling took place. Isolation populations differentiated from their parent populations because of Mendellian Drift.

So, it would be futile to look for a single point of origination or geneology for "Jews, Greeks, Hindus," etc. They are all mixed and mongrel. Cultural identifications arose later due to language and "politicis" (in its widest sense).

The historical past books that are taught in faculties and faculties at the instant are not continuously nicely suited bcoz historical past is often distorted by utilising the political human beings you will get actual information of a non secular community from there non secular books additionally, occasion--in case you opt to be attentive to with regard to the historical past of buddhist faith seek for suggestion from there non secular books each and every thing is pronounced over there. What i be attentive to that the full of the human race has come from africa ......From africa the person have migrated diffrent places hundreds of year in the past greek subculture became progressed in greece ..............Jew subculture became progressed in Arab and Hindu subculture became progressed in India itself some historians declare that hindu faith got here from exterior India like they are asserting that Aryans migrated from significant asia to north India it is unfaithful and baseless hindu human beings and subculture are community indians yet islam and christianity became progressed in arab so those are arabian cultures

No, most of the ancestors of Greeks,Jews (&indeed most of all those in living in Europe)etc came from either the middle and near east (Anatolia,Mesopotamia etc) or else were post ice-age peoples who emerged from refuges in the mountains around Spain & France.

The Aryans (nobles)!