Nozick did not state that. Nozick stated that "SOME ANARCHISTS HAVE CLAIMED not merely that we would be better off without a state, but that any state necessarily violates people's moral rights and hence is intrinsically immoral." So, I disagree with your statement that Nozick stated that because you are wrong. One stating the position of another is not making a value statement themselves.

I don't know what Nozick means by "people's moral rights" and what all that encompasses. So I cannot say whether I agree or not. You need to define that.

Define moral, theocracies are inherently immoral but claim moral superiority