When I say instrumental, I mean music without vocals; there are no lyrics to express what the artist(s) wishes to express. This makes instrumental music much more ambiguous and possibly better.
Update:The 'misspelling' was intentional. Music is sick (i.e. amazing, great), so I combined the terms.
The new word reads essentially the same.
Copyright © 2024 1QUIZZ.COM - All rights reserved.
Answers & Comments
Does it make it better? Without vocals, it's even easier for the meaning of the music to be misinterpreted.
And of course, judging which kind of music is better comes down to a matter of opinion.
I personally, prefer music with vocals overall.
I prefer instrumental music. I love soundtracks from movies in particular (John Williams, Danny Elfman, both really good composers). I mean, how can't you listen to the Avatar Soundtrack, or Harry Potter Soundtrack? It allows you to use your imagination.
thanks we all know what that means
and i really dont know i mean i LOVE music both ways, but it also depends on the melody and tune, and the instruments used, as some instrumentals of the same song may sound better than others...
I love them both
i like instrumental. whether i did no longer, i might nonetheless ought to take heed to it. My son in undemanding terms falls asleep if i activate some Youtube instrumental song, in actuality, that piano song is a solid one. i think of i will basically ought to play it for him (:
ok then.
But I think that the composer can still express his/herself even without words, possibly better without.
Not sure but I love music love.