Anyone reading about the visit to the tomb by the two Marys and several other persons, will if honest, tell you that visit could not have occurred as printed in the bible. No one can visit a tomb 3 or 4 times at different hours with different person or alone and yet still have visited only once. The story is a horrid joke as written. The fake Jesus' body was found by the visitors to be missing and the stone rolled away from the entrance. Read before, during and after and you might open your mind to understand that the visitors (it is all fake) but as written mistook Lazarus' tomb to be that of Jesus. This shows that Jesus was a fake and was never crucified nor rose from death. You believers know that you are lying or trying to make up lies in hope that you can make your stories seem true. You can't. There is not one thing true as written in the bible about the fake Jesus. Nothing.
Yes. This and many other factors prove without any doubt that it is the authentic burial cloth of Christ.
Why do we have to even listen to the groans of those who want to disrupt the facts?
Everybody was not crucified with a crown of thorns or a spear that pierced their side. The image on the Shroud is of a man 5 feet 10 1/2 inches tall, about 175 pounds, covered with scourge wounds and blood stains.
And, these marks, combined with the capping of thorns which is not found anywhere else in Crucifixion literature of ancient Roman (Tacitus, Suetonius, Pliny the Elder or Pliny the Younger) or Jewish historians (Flavius Josephus, Philo of Alexandria) create a unique signature of the historical Jesus of Nazareth. Numerous surgeons and pathologists (including Dr. Frederick Zugibe (Medical Examiner - Rockland, New York), Dr. Robert Bucklin (Medical Examiner - Las Vegas, Nevada), Dr. Herman Moedder (Germany), the late Dr. Pierre Barbet (France), and Dr. David Willis (England) have studied the match between the Words, Weapons and Wounds, and agree that the words of the New Testament regarding the Passion clearly match the wounds depicted on the Shroud, and that these wounds are consistent with the weapons used by ancient Roman soldiers in Crucifixion.
Specifically, the scourge marks on the shoulders, back, and legs of the Man of the Shroud match the flagrum (Roman whip) which has three leather thongs, each having two lead or bone pellets (plumbatae) on the end. The lance wound in the right side matches the Roman Hasta (4cm x 1 cm spear wound).
Btw, these are facts, not just ordinary guesswork by any ragtag and bobtail!
Did you know that all such claims have been refuted (by scientists)? Source: Radiocarbon Dating, Second Edition: An Archaeological Perspective, By R.E. Taylor, Ofer Bar-Yosef, Routledge 2016; pp. 167–168.
No, I didn't know that because is a lie... scientist, Christians and the Bible had already mentioned and proof is fake.
Scientists at three separate laboratories dated samples from the Shroud to a range of 1260–1390 AD, which coincides with the first certain appearance of the shroud in the 1350s.
The Turin Shroud is a fake. That is the verdict of Catholic Bishop Pierre d’Arcis who has written in 1390 to tell the Pope it was “a clever sleight of hand” by someone “falsely declaring this was the actual shroud in which Jesus was enfolded in the tomb.
The Bible makes no mention of a burial shroud with Christ’s image on it don't mention any Shroud like that in the Gospels... IN the Bible it is recorded that the family washed and prepared the body for burial in the jewish tradition so no blood would have remained on the body.
Answers & Comments
Verified answer
I know that pollen from the time of Christ was found on it.
A previous study was mistakenly done on a section patched after a medieval fire, leading to the incorrect conclusion that it's not was old as it is..
Anyone reading about the visit to the tomb by the two Marys and several other persons, will if honest, tell you that visit could not have occurred as printed in the bible. No one can visit a tomb 3 or 4 times at different hours with different person or alone and yet still have visited only once. The story is a horrid joke as written. The fake Jesus' body was found by the visitors to be missing and the stone rolled away from the entrance. Read before, during and after and you might open your mind to understand that the visitors (it is all fake) but as written mistook Lazarus' tomb to be that of Jesus. This shows that Jesus was a fake and was never crucified nor rose from death. You believers know that you are lying or trying to make up lies in hope that you can make your stories seem true. You can't. There is not one thing true as written in the bible about the fake Jesus. Nothing.
Yes. This and many other factors prove without any doubt that it is the authentic burial cloth of Christ.
Why do we have to even listen to the groans of those who want to disrupt the facts?
Everybody was not crucified with a crown of thorns or a spear that pierced their side. The image on the Shroud is of a man 5 feet 10 1/2 inches tall, about 175 pounds, covered with scourge wounds and blood stains.
And, these marks, combined with the capping of thorns which is not found anywhere else in Crucifixion literature of ancient Roman (Tacitus, Suetonius, Pliny the Elder or Pliny the Younger) or Jewish historians (Flavius Josephus, Philo of Alexandria) create a unique signature of the historical Jesus of Nazareth. Numerous surgeons and pathologists (including Dr. Frederick Zugibe (Medical Examiner - Rockland, New York), Dr. Robert Bucklin (Medical Examiner - Las Vegas, Nevada), Dr. Herman Moedder (Germany), the late Dr. Pierre Barbet (France), and Dr. David Willis (England) have studied the match between the Words, Weapons and Wounds, and agree that the words of the New Testament regarding the Passion clearly match the wounds depicted on the Shroud, and that these wounds are consistent with the weapons used by ancient Roman soldiers in Crucifixion.
Specifically, the scourge marks on the shoulders, back, and legs of the Man of the Shroud match the flagrum (Roman whip) which has three leather thongs, each having two lead or bone pellets (plumbatae) on the end. The lance wound in the right side matches the Roman Hasta (4cm x 1 cm spear wound).
Btw, these are facts, not just ordinary guesswork by any ragtag and bobtail!
Did you know that all such claims have been refuted (by scientists)? Source: Radiocarbon Dating, Second Edition: An Archaeological Perspective, By R.E. Taylor, Ofer Bar-Yosef, Routledge 2016; pp. 167–168.
Yes I did know that.
No, it hasn't, and even if it had it wouldn't overcome all the other problems with the claim.
No, I didn't know that because is a lie... scientist, Christians and the Bible had already mentioned and proof is fake.
Scientists at three separate laboratories dated samples from the Shroud to a range of 1260–1390 AD, which coincides with the first certain appearance of the shroud in the 1350s.
The Turin Shroud is a fake. That is the verdict of Catholic Bishop Pierre d’Arcis who has written in 1390 to tell the Pope it was “a clever sleight of hand” by someone “falsely declaring this was the actual shroud in which Jesus was enfolded in the tomb.
The Bible makes no mention of a burial shroud with Christ’s image on it don't mention any Shroud like that in the Gospels... IN the Bible it is recorded that the family washed and prepared the body for burial in the jewish tradition so no blood would have remained on the body.
Yes ; especially that is 3D and a negative .
No, it hasn’t, neighbor.
Citation needed.