constitutionality of the homeowner’s association’s actions.?
Asha purchased a condominium in a sprawling two square mile development. She was very impressed with all of the amenities including a bowling alley, movie theater, grocery store, fire department and private security service; as well as the general maintenance and upkeep of the grounds, landscaping and roads. When she bought the “condo”, she realized the homeowner’s association had a variety of rules and regulations that she would need to follow. One regulation was that no children were allowed to live in the complex.
Two years after buying the condominium, Asha gave birth to a child. She was immediately served with papers notifying her to move out of the complex. Discuss the constitutionality of the homeowner’s association’s actions.
More Questions From This User See All
Answers & Comments
Verified answer
There is no constitutionality issue because she voluntarily agreed to the HOA's rules and conditions prior to purchasing a home there. This is why HOA rules are routinely upheld when challenged in court.
In 2003, a splendid courtroom determination (Grutter v. Bollinger, 539 US 244 – splendid courtroom 2003) appropriate to affirmative action in universities allowed educational establishments to contemplate race as a ingredient in admitting scholars, yet ruled that strict factor structures are unconstitutional. this means that the enterprise itself is permitted to have an affirmative action coverage, however the government isn't allowed to mandate it. some STATE constitutions have banned it via constitutional amendments.
According to the home owner's association's rules ( a legal document) that Ash's signed , She agreed to the rules & regulations of the complex, & in those rules & regulation " no children are allowed, since she had a child and no children are allowed she will have to move ... Sorry
In 2003, a ultimate courtroom decision (Grutter v. Bollinger, 539 US 244 – ultimate courtroom 2003) pertaining to to affirmative action in universities allowed educational institutions to contemplate race as a piece in admitting pupils, yet ruled that strict factor structures are unconstitutional. this potential that the employer itself is permitted to have an affirmative action coverage, however the government isn't allowed to mandate it. some STATE constitutions have banned it via potential of constitutional amendments.