¿Alguien bilingüe podría traducirme esta frase al inglés por favor?
"Llegará el día en que el resto de la creación animal podrá adquirir esos derechos que nunca pudieron ser alejados de ellos más que por la mano de la tiranía... un caballo o un perro es, más allá de toda comparación, un animal más racional, así como un animal más comunicativo, que un bebé de un día, una semana o hasta un mes. Pero suponga que fuera al revés, ¿qué avalaría? La pregunta no es, ¿pueden razonar? ni ¿pueden hablar?, sino, ¿pueden sufrir? ¿Por qué se negaría la ley a proteger a cualquier ser sensible? Llegará el día en que la humanidad extenderá su manto sobre todo lo que respire”
Update:me hiciste reir Doethineb... no seas mala!
More Questions From This User See All
Answers & Comments
Verified answer
"The day will come when the rest of the animal creation will acquire those rights which cannot be taken away from them except by the hand of tyranny...a horse or dog is an immeasurably more rational animal, as well as a more communicative animal, than a baby one day, one week, or even one month old. But what if it were the other way round? What would prevail? The question is not so much one of: "can they think?" "can they talk?" as: "can they suffer?" Why is there resistance to a law to protect any sentient creature? The day will come when humanity will extend its protection to every breathing thing."
¿y las moscas? ¿los parasitos?
"Some day the rest of the animal creation may acquire those rights which could never be away from them rather than by the hand of tyranny ... a horse or dog is beyond comparison, another animal rational and a more communicative animal, a baby one day, a week or even a month. But suppose it to happen, what would endorse? The question is, Can they reason? nor Can they talk?, but , Can they suffer? Why deny the law to protect any sentient being? The day will come when humanity will extend its mantle over everything that breathes "
" It will be soon when the rest of animal creation will be able to have the rights that were taken away from them because of tyranny... a horse,a dog is, even some comparisons, a rational animal, as well as a communicative animal, even more communicative than a baby who is just borned, or even if he's a week older or a month. But guess.. it was the other way round, what would you choose? the question isn't is , can they think?, not even can they talk?, the question is, can they suffer?. ¿Why would the law refuse to protect any sensible creature?. the day when the humanity will spread out his hand for every creature that breath, is near.
there will be a day when the rest of the animal creation may acquire those rights which could never be away from them rather than by the hand of tyranny ... a horse or dog is beyond comparison a more rational animal, and a more communicative animal, a baby one day, a week or even a month. But suppose it to be the other way round, what would endorse? The question is, Can they reason? nor Can they talk?, but, Can they suffer? Why deny the law to protect any sentient being? The day will come when humanity will extend its mantle over everything that breathes "
espero que te ayude y no haberme equivocado
un saludo!
Esa frase?? jajaja eso es todo un paárrafo. Te voy a traducir tan solo la primer frase:
A day will come when the rest of the life can get the rights that never could be apart of them, only because the hand of tiranny.
Saludos.
The day will come when the rest of the animal creation may acquire those rights which could never be away from them rather than by the hand of tyranny ... a horse or dog is beyond comparison a more rational animal, and a more communicative animal, a baby one day, a week or even a month. But suppose it to happen, what would endorse? The question is, Can they reason? nor Can they talk?, but, Can they suffer? Why deny the law to protect any sentient being? The day will come when humanity will extend its mantle over everything that breathes
" There will come the day in which the rest of the animal creation will be able to acquire these rights that could never be removed from them any more than for the hand of the tyranny ... a horse or a dog is, beyond any comparison, a more rational animal, as well as a more communicative animal, that a baby of one day, one week or up to one month. But suppose that it was upside-down, what would it support? The question is not, can they reason? Not can they speak?, but, can they suffer? Why would one deny the law to protect any sensitive being? There will come the day in which the humanity will extend his mantle especially what he breathes "
"Some day the rest of the animal creation may acquire those rights which could never be away from them rather than by the hand of tyranny ... a horse or dog is beyond comparison, another animal rational and a more communicative animal, a baby one day, a week or even a month. But suppose it to happen, what would endorse? This question is not, Can they reason? nor Can they talk?, but , Can they suffer? Why deny the law to protect any sentient being? The day will come when humanity will extend its mantle over everything that breathes "